Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 04:15:37 +0200 From: Tomek CEDRO <tomek@cedro.info> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Host address zero vs bridge, carp and nat Message-ID: <CAFYkXjnqM=iry%2B%2BodCfTTC9W=KQife0nNVx%2BS5K9VuvPy9Dbdg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BFC2AEDB-4245-4B01-BBC0-9582D5CAC63E@gid.co.uk> References: <BFC2AEDB-4245-4B01-BBC0-9582D5CAC63E@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 12:00=E2=80=AFAM Bob Bishop wrote: > (..) > doesn=E2=80=99t pass traffic through the bridge. The NAT is in-kernel via= ipfw and there are firewall rules in play but they do not seem to be a fac= tor. Have you tried sysctl ? net.link.bridge.ipfw=3D0 net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=3D0 net.link.bridge.pfil_member=3D0 --=20 CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFYkXjnqM=iry%2B%2BodCfTTC9W=KQife0nNVx%2BS5K9VuvPy9Dbdg>