From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 22 15: 6:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (paprika.michvhf.com [209.57.60.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC80011064 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:06:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 29811 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Feb 1999 23:06:42 -0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000d01be5eac$87517140$29e76dd1@dialup.phate.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:06:41 -0500 (EST) X-Face: *0^4Iw) To: phate1@ix.netcom.com Subject: RE: Software bandwidth limiting solution Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-Feb-99 phate1@ix.netcom.com wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running 3.0-Stable. > > I'm trying to limit bandwidth to one of the boxes to to below 5Mbps (it's > eating up a full 10Mbps lan).. > Specifically just limit port 80 (web traffic) so I can telnet/ftp without > any lag.. > > I tried dummynet, but it only seems to queue incoming packets, which results > in me running out of my mbufs (8192 total), and the system reboots. > > Can a software solution handle this? Or would I need something hardware > based? Unless someone changed something in Dummynet you can limit in both directions by rule. Take another look at your ipfw rules. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include TEAM-OS2 Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message