From owner-freebsd-arch Fri Aug 10 14: 8:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D5237B405; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by nagual.pp.ru (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f7AL8Qf16444; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:08:27 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 01:08:22 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Garrett Wollman Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFR: fseek<0 + feof error (with fix) Message-ID: <20010811010820.A16395@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20010810232939.A14964@nagual.pp.ru> <20010810234922.A15324@nagual.pp.ru> <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200108102100.f7AL03x37506@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 17:00:03 -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > No, [EOVERFLOW] is for Large File Summit support. Of course for it too, but it is the other end of the valid range. As it says, "the resulting file offset would be a value which cannot be represented correctly" and it cannot be, because range overflow occurse in the calculation process, not given directly in arguments, as for EINVAL. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message