Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:57:39 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ? Message-ID: <XFMail.20040819175739.jdp@polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <41254847.9020102@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked us to work it out on our own. On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote: > Ok so what is the next number that should be used? > it's currently #define __FreeBSD_version 600000 > > 600001? Yes, that would be the next number. I question whether __FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION. Any port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change __FreeBSD_version for this. (Not that I feel very strongly about it.) > here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment.. > it's ready to commit. Thanks for taking this on. I haven't tested it, but it looks good. Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20040819175739.jdp>