Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:26:44 +0000 From: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> To: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any suggestions for a layer 3 load ablancer for 12, as relayd doesnt work anymore Message-ID: <CE982D9E-B391-48E4-9E05-8501182EE6C3@exonetric.com> In-Reply-To: <3D5F990E-5E0E-4B5C-9D9B-C0A1C1F7EDCB@exonetric.com> References: <E1gj4tQ-000MGi-0H@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> <3D5F990E-5E0E-4B5C-9D9B-C0A1C1F7EDCB@exonetric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 14 Jan 2019, at 16:23, Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> wrote: > > >> On 14 Jan 2019, at 16:15, Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> wrote: >> >> So, until the middle of this afternoon I was, doing my load balancing using >> relayd from ports and PF. My own fault for not checking, but I upgraded >> one of the firewall pair to 12 and then discovered that the relayd port is >> no longer available. >> >> Am now puzzling over solutions to this - I dont really want to stay on >> 11 forevere. Moving to OpenBSD to get their PF and relayd is a bit of >> an uncomfortable idea as we gain a lot from having one OS everywhere that >> people know, so does anyone have any suggestions ? >> >> PF round robin is not good enough for this as I have some dynamic problems >> which indicate when a node is up or down. Relayd will check these, but the >> basic PF wil not as far as I know. >> >> What do other people do ? > > Use HAproxy for basic load balancing and Traefik for more sophisticated usage. Not sure how you get seamless failover with either though. That was the nice thing about relayd/PF > > - Mark Forgot, Nginx and Apache are technically options as well. - Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CE982D9E-B391-48E4-9E05-8501182EE6C3>