From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Aug 23 11:22:08 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA09921
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 23 Aug 1998 11:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA09911;
          Sun, 23 Aug 1998 11:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: (from eischen@localhost)
	by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id OAA17721;
	Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:21:44 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 14:21:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
Message-Id: <199808231821.OAA17721@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
To: handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu, jmb@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Not receiving CVS commit messages
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> >       yep....seems that we sub-divided the lists to a greater
> >       extent than nearly anyone wanted or needed.
>
> >       in fairness, i have to say that a couple people have
> >       asked about it....less than 6 people.
>
> I have to agree, it was broken up probably a bit agressively and could be
> toned down some.  For a while I was only following cvs-ports; I imagine
> some of the portsmeisters would go for that too.  It would be nice to see
> that again, but I have no opinion on whether all the src/ subdivisions
> should return.

And I'd like to see src and _not_ ports.  Perhaps at least a
separate list for each?

Dan Eischen
eischen@vigrid.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message