From owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 19:52:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19E9E05F55 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raparkhurst@digitalsynapse.io) Received: from sender-of-o52.zoho.com (sender-of-o52.zoho.com [135.84.80.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813567660F for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:52:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raparkhurst@digitalsynapse.io) Received: from [10.10.0.110] (cpe-66-68-160-213.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.160.213]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1504986764452146.96058269741548; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 12:52:44 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309 Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 14:52:41 -0500 Subject: Re: Xorg question on FreeBSD 11.1 From: Robert Parkhurst To: Mark Linimon CC: FreeBSD-sparc64 Message-ID: <1CD52BED-3135-4ED0-A73F-500B1B133B05@digitalsynapse.io> Thread-Topic: Xorg question on FreeBSD 11.1 References: <1504912654.4543.5.camel@digitalsynapse.io> <20170909171502.GA22562@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20170909171502.GA22562@lonesome.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:52:57 -0000 I kind of figured. Still though, that=E2=80=99s a bummer! I will work on my box and see if I can get GCC 4.9 as the default and go fr= om there. I=E2=80=99ll likely have questions, but I=E2=80=99ll check google before I bo= mbard you with more.=20 Thank you, =20 Robert Parkhurst On 9/9/17, 12:15 PM, "Mark Linimon" wrote: The problem is that our sparc64 userbase is small, and our userbase of sparc64/x11 is even smaller. =20 I do periodic package builds (well, subsets), but I mainly focus on server-class ports these days. So, I don't remember off the top of my head what the state of those ports is. =20 I am traveling and thus it is awkward for me to access my build machine right now. My first suggestion is that you try to downgrade the defaul= t gcc to 4.9 (the last one I have gotten much coverage with) and try agai= n. =20 mcl =20