Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:34:14 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331810 - in head: Mk/Uses archivers/lha archivers/lha-ac audio/mp3gain comms/vrflash converters/mpack emulators/vmw german/dtaus graphics/hobbes-icons-xpm irc/iroffer irc/iroffer-dinoe... Message-ID: <20131126073414.GD19582@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311260414350.1711@tuna.site> References: <201310272229.r9RMTkd2060648@svn.freebsd.org> <526E39C2.2000806@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1311260414350.1711@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:17:46PM +0900, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > portmgr has decided that manpages should be in the plist; you=20 > > should not unilaterally decide to re-add a macro for it again. >=20 > One question on this that's been in my head for a while: Should > we ever move man pages from .gz to .xz, say, how will we go about > this in ports? >=20 > To me that is the main design disadvantage of moving from MAN=3D to=20 > pkg-plist. I am sure this has been considered and I just have not > seen the answer. >=20 lates discussions and tests shown that it was absolutly useless to use .xz = for manpages, we had a couple of discussions about it on the mailin lists regards, Bapt --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlKUTvYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EysVQCfcvmtBCFmUUSVYvoIfVquWKnM N88An1074NlZE+oG/nHX1Mh9n6LTDt9x =Lf7w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131126073414.GD19582>