Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:29:16 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r392666 - head/audio/libgroove Message-ID: <55AF9AAC.8000106@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <de0f94bb48432295c450da4dffbd4ba6@gahr.ch> References: <201507220652.t6M6qVFO094263@repo.freebsd.org> <d4dfd69de717fd8d4e5ef472408644e1@gahr.ch> <20150722122313.GA50653@FreeBSD.org> <20150722122531.GB50653@FreeBSD.org> <de0f94bb48432295c450da4dffbd4ba6@gahr.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/22/2015 2:44 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > On 2015-07-22 14:25, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > In clear contrast with the PHB, which states "If this line is present, > future maintainers must > not change or remove it except at the original author's request." > > It does *not* say "Future maintainers can change it if not explicitly > asked not to.". > > Look, we do have rules so we don't have to argue about taste, style, > what's more sensible to you, etc. > >> Sorry I forgot to ask: so any problem with expansion? > > Yes, I do. Please revert. > So reverting it obviously goes against current practice. Is the "problem" one of principle? In other words, are you torqued because danfe touched the makefile, so you want him to revert it regardless of the commit itself? From afar, this appears like you are trying to make a point at the expense of the ports tree. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55AF9AAC.8000106>