From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 10:10:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CAC37B404 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0AA43F75 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:10:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h39HABUp004684 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:10:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h39HABRG004683; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200304091710.h39HABRG004683@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: parv Subject: Re: ports/38602: x11-wm/tvtwm is confused about PREFIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: parv List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 17:10:12 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/38602; it has been noted by GNATS. From: parv To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: f-gnats Subject: Re: ports/38602: x11-wm/tvtwm is confused about PREFIX Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:10:03 -0400 in message <20030407075136.GA1778@moo.holy.cow>, wrote parv thusly... > > in message <200304062346.h36NkRbN052478@freefall.freebsd.org>, > wrote Edwin Groothuis thusly... > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed ... > > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 6 16:45:50 PDT 2003 > > State-Changed-Why: > > It installs properly here with PREFIX set to /home/edwin/X11R6-5. > > Problem is not solved yet. USE_X_PREFIX seem to override PREFIX; > empty +CONTENTS is put in the /var/db/pkg/tvtwm-pl11. Below is the > relevant output end of following commands... Could somebody please reopen this PR as this PR seemed to be steam-rolled over in order to close it. Problem still exists & i can reproduce on demand. If somebody need some form of debugging data not already submitted, i am more than willing to do that; just let me know what i need to do to generate that data. - parv --