Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:09:39 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712110904320.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> In-Reply-To: <EC0F9F41-4A57-4A8F-A7B4-67D954182DDA@adamw.org> References: <fb3d23c5-e32d-452a-a0c3-c3cb12340054@cloudzeeland.nl> <a66d1c33-e405-d9e8-d9c3-2738b5e66887@cloudzeeland.nl> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712080956580.41281@wonkity.com> <20171208180905.GA96560@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091013310.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <20171209012522.GA42506@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712091451300.35694@aneurin.horsfall.org> <fe88c5e6-155d-dd64-96d5-8f394c41d92f@FreeBSD.org> <20171210171122.GA48536@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <EC0F9F41-4A57-4A8F-A7B4-67D954182DDA@adamw.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Dec 2017, Adam Weinberger wrote: > DMA is a phenomenal program and is totally sufficient for a large > percentage of our user-base. I wasn’t aware of the lack of .forward > support, and I completely agree that that’s a very detrimental omission. What about its spam filtering, such as /etc/mail/access and DNSBLs etc? (I hope it's a coincidence that its name is also the same as the pro-spam Direct Marketing Association...) -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 10 22:26:01 2017 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE21E9F0A0 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71A8E65C35; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Received: from yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:232:36ff:fe5c:3a87]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A398B0053E; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from gramr.alkumuna.eu ([IPv6:2a01:e35:8a74:6e70:62a4:4cff:fe54:b212]) (authenticated bits=0) by yggdrasil.alkumuna.eu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id vBAMPpdB066845 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:25:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mazhe@alkumuna.eu) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 23:25:50 +0100 From: Matthieu Volat <mazhe@alkumuna.eu> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> Cc: Chris H <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster Message-ID: <20171210232550.27114ee0@gramr.alkumuna.eu> In-Reply-To: <d041e1cc-b204-e2b4-ee0b-5d742b3787d1@freebsd.org> References: <20171209102517.005de250@gramr.alkumuna.eu> <17c98bad038d40d023c8e1e3f93fe160@udns.ultimatedns.net> <20171210184716.604de089@gramr.alkumuna.eu> <d041e1cc-b204-e2b4-ee0b-5d742b3787d1@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/MEjG+AQpLSzmnQsVrBssiJh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alkumuna.eu; s=default; t=1512944752; bh=NTPRTB8QRGQv98KNqmSng2n6jUNn9oSnBdhHlKbrKVA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GEFWxATmzACFb12D1yityVYAaRKVJ27LF6JEnnahd839XlqvbZY/6WqHTvlj2GBhUJzQTP927sr/OHpzMGNFgfS6KFYzh8ktwtW/QUQMDbT6VPfJ1Ho7DIvkYQr+OER7uT+8RDyNhTA18WLuB1ID7TbYO/kaFWuhChZZrGv939E= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:26:01 -0000 --Sig_/MEjG+AQpLSzmnQsVrBssiJh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:33:25 +0100 Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org> wrote: > Am 10.12.17 um 18:47 schrieb Matthieu Volat: > > They do... but only if you commit and push something (even if it's only > > a personnal clone). If you just keep the changes on your computer, ther= e's > > nothing. =20 > The GitHub master version has changes, that are not yet in any release. As someone involved in some projects, I do understand the differences betwe= en working trees and releases, this was specifically about helping developp= ement by being more communicative about it. There's nothing in the commit tree (<https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/= commits/master>) nor the networkd (<https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster/n= etwork>) as of now regarding this issue. I don't know for others, but this = has led me to invest some time not knowing this was duplicate work. >=20 > This is irrelevant as long as FLAVOR support is missing in portmaster, > since there is no version that fully supports flavors, right now. Please understand I am not asking for a working release, I'm asking for a m= ore transparent developpement process that would allow other people to more= easily follow, familiarize themselves with and help in portmaster developm= ent... >=20 > > As much as I am defiant of github on certain aspects, I've found in qui= te > > some occasion the discussion/comment system around pull requests quite = nice. =20 >=20 > I'm working in FLAVOR support and I have a version that correctly builds > the Python ports, that have been converted. >=20 > But I'm currently trying to understand, where the information that the > ports is to be re-installed, gets lost. Debugging shell scripts is a lot > of work, since you cannot single step through them. Portmaster does call > itself recursively, which further complicates understanding and tracing > the execution. (Besides, portmaster is a main program of 4300+ lines with > functions sprinkled throughout the code. I have a local version, which > breaks this large main program in named subroutines, which makes it much > easier to understand the logic flow, but hides the actual changes when > creating diffs. I have backported the FLAVOR changes to a portmaster > version without those subroutines, to get the minimal functional patch, > but now I'm fighting with the install vs. upgrade distinction being lost.) You can however set the execution trace argument to produce a full log. I w= as under the impression that when encountering package@flavor, splitting wa= s needed in a few places to match the port directory and then simply add -D= FLAVOR=3Dvalue to the MAKEFLAGS. >=20 > I can send you the current version in private mail (I do not want to spam > the mail-list with a 120k+ shell script). This is exactly why I thought a WIP branch or something of the like would b= e useful, unless you want to proceed alone without any feedback. But then a= gain, I posted my own (naive) approach at the issue and it did not seems to= provoke any feedback, so maybe I was a bit too much hopeful. --Sig_/MEjG+AQpLSzmnQsVrBssiJh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE1xv/SVkem9252haa3yo2fFz8JX4FAlottG4ACgkQ3yo2fFz8 JX4BYQ//edBV91KVnMXH1LxxTUf5RzRwHbdLVUUImASTpWgi3uEHiMlDo6iGs74J vzfNfrmlrzjiMzkkpTXndPzM9T/cWRcHY5q1DqFdEh2w5ZdhOna+GNO2rQ+jzVsb dpyTzZ8vI1FKXAyVY32LlpTNxaBtybih7gBAZqJFnD+rr/ApUxvbRJr2lbwe3OBa R4bHkdUpS7Ra74u0on3BLvALQwOpRewqJRtpzHJGEWd53oq44ud8qGKg8SXG6asr f1/od9VMmWk1wFDK/VnJ7qfOt0nuVOx1DPavzSlVln5GcNJ5J47g9VbDP+I1N7wU X/2JOXdwHp1UPq03FSnoU0Pkd3VSUnXCtvvCOIp2EGDxTyGywdPcbC+M7EKLOb45 Cf7Xnhf913kD3sM5I4oHv6VDigq4oUlbz4Q+1fED7v0GAbLkIPDbAuJTBBCm6IHQ nI40U7DGhjCae5bPItJDzbcuTdFTiNcMUBtFGMT/ig4XLD9XIdodaAWGCWRyzNia YYO+jSKom9TWf7wfsTb5gXM2ZzL1IpP1mfGreSpX0jInrFfdNJX4wrdSnEVqQt0B 7Gz2ktI/qmJWJeIu/dgrdcE1d2Vd6oICagPmy1loV526Gdbwrr2RsLywKokmcPtS 0vFI5HccTFMkUhBuAD6mFFc0vjqMR5JWViLocYTeQTebqdeDL4Q= =rdYC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MEjG+AQpLSzmnQsVrBssiJh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.21.1712110904320.35694>