From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 26 10:50:46 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA24844 for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:50:46 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA24838 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:50:45 -0700 Received: from halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu (halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.159]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA07355 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 10:50:41 -0700 Received: by halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.3.6) id AA18654; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 13:47:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 13:47:43 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <9506261747.AA18654@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2). In-Reply-To: References: <199506260920.LAA12300@grumble.grondar.za> <9506261507.AA18338@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk < said: > SSL exists now in pre-RFC state until October. NOT ALL RFCs ARE STANDARDS. INTERNET-DRAFTS ARE NOT STANDARDS. Unless Netscape gives up change control on this specification, it will never be a standard. There does not exist general agreement in the community at this point what is the best mechanism to provide end-to-end security. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant