From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Sep 15 07:29:51 1995
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA06504
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 07:29:51 -0700
Received: from guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de (guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de [141.58.127.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA06489
          ; Fri, 15 Sep 1995 07:29:37 -0700
Received: by guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de (Smail3.1.28.1 #21)
	id m0stbmn-0002kHC; Fri, 15 Sep 95 16:30 MET DST
Message-Id: <m0stbmn-0002kHC@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 95 16:30 MET DST
From: nils@guru.ims.uni-stuttgart.de (Cornelis van der Laan)
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, jmacd@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gnats port doesn't build
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Here is the problem I run into: the gnat runtime library will be
compiled by the newly created gnat1 compiler and this will happen:

+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| No source file position information available                            |
| Please submit bug report by email to gnat-report@cs.nyu.edu              |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug             |
| Include full sources in ASCII in a format compatible with gnatchop       |
| First line of sources must be marked by an Ada -- comment line           |
| Last line of sources must be last line of email message (no signature!)  |
| See gnatinfo.txt file for more info on procedure for submitting bugs     |
| GNAT V2.06 (i386--freebsd) Gigi abort, Code=999                          |
+==========================================================================+

The message will be displayed on and on. (I have not yet filed a bug 
report because GNAT in all versions runs on FreeBSD 1.1.5 without
that problem. Are there any differences other than off_t which could
break the compiler? Using a 1.1.5 compiler on 2.0.5 works, btw.)

Nils