From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 1 14:45:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA6237B405 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:45:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g11MjXX56796; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:45:33 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <15448.64681.401219.163184@guru.mired.org> <5F46C986-16DB-11D6-8CEC-00039359034A@mac.com> <20020201173641.GA48397@student.uu.se> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:45:32 -0500 To: Erik Trulsson , Paul Fardy From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: *_enable="YES" behavior is bogus Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Oh. Damn. Someone *added* freebsd-current to this thread without removing freebsd-stable. Several people have requested that we stop discussing this on freebsd-stable, and I *thought* I was only sending my recent messages to the one mailing list. I do not particularly care which mailing list this discussion is on, but I really think we should pick one mailing list and keep it on only one list. Peoples' nerves are frazzled enough already about this topic without having to see this on two mailing lists! I'm sending this message only to stable, with the hint being that maybe we should debate the topic only on -current, as several others have suggested/requested. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message