From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 10:39:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EFC16A4CE; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:39:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2532143D1D; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:39:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (teodvftb@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14]) by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1FId5o26195476; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:39:05 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:39:05 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040215213600.T3823@news1.macomnet.ru> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails that keep hanging around X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:39:08 -0000 Robert, Thank you very much for your summary. [...] > > Should I worry about these jails or is it harmless: > > It's probably harmless unless there's a leak. Jails are fairly > light-weight objects, so if it takes a little longer to GC due to TCP, > it's OK. On the other hand, if there's a leak, that's very bad; likewise, It is a leak. I proveded a how to repeat sequence in my previous reply to this thread. -- Maxim Konovalov