From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 10:30:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C17A80 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDDC307 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900EF4B8A; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EA12413CF4; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:46 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: Strange package checksum report References: <21698.32224.747971.146491@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> <868ugrr5r3.fsf@nine.des.no> <21700.23803.911745.834275@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:29:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <21700.23803.911745.834275@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> (Garrett Wollman's message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:03:23 -0500") Message-ID: <86y4orp2zp.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:30:44 -0000 Garrett Wollman writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > These are Pyhon bytecode files. They are automatically regenerated if > > you have write access to them and Python thinks they are stale when it > > tries to load them. Apparently, Python's definition of "stale" is > > slightly more complex than just comparing timestamps; they are one of > > the reasons why Baptiste gave up reproducible package builds. > That's unfortunate. Well, it's a bug. I assume that you're using official packages and don't have a locally compiled Python interpreter or anything like that? Could you perhaps turn on auditing in order to find out what's touching these files? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no