From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 6 07:28:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C992F16A41F for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802ED43D49 for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EC01FF6C8; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 00:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (home.elischer.org [216.240.48.38]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j767S9ia094728; Sat, 6 Aug 2005 00:28:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Message-ID: <42F46681.10708@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:28:01 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050424 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <21744.1123267707@phk.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: putting HESIOD, Appletalk and IPX on notice X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 07:28:10 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > I think it is time we deorbit HESIOD in toto. > > At the same time, making Appletalk and IPX "opt in" facilities by > putting them under > YES_IPX > and > YES_APPLETALK how does this differ from options NETATALK and options NETIPX? Or do you mean for the complete build, i.e netstat etc. as well? My comment on both is that they do live as good working examples of other "foreign" network stacks.I also know that there are quite a few old MACS sitting around doing various pronter management functions etc. I don't know whether they will be gone by 2007 though. > boolean build options seems a sensible move. > > Comments ? > > The first RELENG_7 release would happen in 2006 or 2007, there is no way > they will need any of those three protocols. >