Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:44:00 +0300 From: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> To: Dmitriy Demidov <dima_bsd@inbox.lv> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help test softupdates journaling (SUJ) Message-ID: <a31046fc1001100844s112b770bx7835d38b3fe72fd6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201001101827.09631.dima_bsd@inbox.lv> References: <201001101526.49411.dima_bsd@inbox.lv> <a31046fc1001100549w3b680a7bq4efa19401257c799@mail.gmail.com> <201001101827.09631.dima_bsd@inbox.lv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/1/10 Dmitriy Demidov <dima_bsd@inbox.lv>: > On Sunday 10 January 2010, pluknet wrote: >> After looking on line numbers I'd suggest you to check >> if you've applied the patch two times (so suj.c "duplicates" itself). >> [...] > cc -O0 -pipe -I/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs -I/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/../mount -g -DRESCUE -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/suj.c > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/suj.c:397: warning: 'ino_isfree' defined but not used > *** Error code 1 > You've patched correctly. The problem is in source itself: the ino_isfree() function was used in an earlier patch but #if 0'defed out in the current one. You should comment out ino_isfree() body to silent the compiler and try again. -- wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a31046fc1001100844s112b770bx7835d38b3fe72fd6>