From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 19 08:51:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD3816A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990343D5C for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:51:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b126.otenet.gr [212.205.244.134]) iAJ8pFda027689 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:51:16 +0200 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAJ8osCN084118 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:50:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAJ8osKP084117 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:50:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@freebsd.org) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:50:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041119085054.GB83736@gothmog.gr> References: <20041118164356.GA46185@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <20041119081734.GC676@loge.nixsys.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041119081734.GC676@loge.nixsys.be> Subject: Re: bug of misc/screen and fifos or ours? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:51:19 -0000 On 2004-11-19 09:17, Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2004-11-18 18:43:56 (+0200), Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > The screen-4.0.2 version that misc/screen installs is apparently the latest > > version of screen available. It also contains a zillion bugs, is written in > > a very insecure style, it uses an antiquated version of autoconf script, > > etc. > > Unrelated, perhaps, but has anyone else noticed that on sparc64, the date > stuck in utmp seems to always be '19700101': I'll have a look later today and this weekend to the utmp handling of screen. It may be just a bug that shows up on 64-bit architectures. > | (philip@wotan)~% w > | 9:16am up 7 days, 7:52, 1 user, load averages: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01 > | USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT > | philip p1 loge:S.0 01Jan70 - w > > I've not seen this happen on any other platforms... Does anyone on amd64 use screen to see if this happens there too?