Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Sep 1999 19:32:48 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To:        Alexander Maret <maret@atrada.de>
Cc:        "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: softupdates: do I understand this correctly? 
Message-ID:  <16019.938021568@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:21:31 %2B0200." <58A002A02C5ED311812E0050044517F00D23B9@erlangen01.axis.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:21:31 +0200, Alexander Maret wrote:

> advantage of softupdates: - in case of a crash it is more likely that
> every data is already been written to disk because the system writes
> data in one go and doesn't have to wait i.e. for a program output
> while there is an open file.

It isn't more likely that _all_ the data will have been written to the
disk. It's just more likely that whatever's state the disk is in will be
consistent.

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16019.938021568>