Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Oct 2017 13:15:59 +0000
From:      "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To:        Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net>, "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Crypto overhaul
Message-ID:  <24228.1509196559@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>
References:  <dc08792a-3215-611c-eb9f-4936a0d621f9@metricspace.net> <CAG5KPzws=jmF2wLeEAz8Lzn7Ugude=0w5neoQjeDjYnGtJpS9Q@mail.gmail.com> <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAG5KPzxGtAwV-svCv24FbZtLvxKCwX7OSyb2pPaTc63EUmFFGA@mail.gmail.com> <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org> <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk> <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--------
In message <20171028123132.GF96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes:

>I would say that the 1.1.x series is less bad, especially on the last count,
>but don't know how much you've looked at the differences in the new branch.

While "less bad" is certainly a laudable goal for OpenSSL, I hope
FreeBSD has higher ambitions.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24228.1509196559>