From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Jul 21 05:40:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id FAA29743
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 05:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA29738
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 05:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA21730; Sun, 21 Jul 1996 08:40:14 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199607211240.IAA21730@whizzo.transsys.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: whizzo.transsys.com: Host localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM>
Subject: Re: cu(1) stopped working? 
References: <199607210744.JAA05208@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 Jul 1996 09:44:56 +0200."
             <199607210744.JAA05208@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 08:40:14 -0400
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


> > And yes, I have been meaning to switch to tip anyway... looks like
> > now is the time.  Just wanted everyone to have my one data point on
> > this.
> 
> Do you have any reason to switch to tip?  I find the Taylor config
> files much more intelligible than all the /etc/remote etc. stuff.

It's pretty suprising, since we all "know" that tip and cu have both
used /etc/remote for years.  In fact, the tip(1) man page even covers
cu, which furthers confusion for the unsuspecting UNIX user.

louie