From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 10 10:27: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7B014D6B for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:27:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA98697; Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:26:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: "Allen Pulsifer" Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: Next release should be called 5.0 (was:4.4 BSD forever?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Jan 2000 09:13:35 EST." Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:26:39 -0800 Message-ID: <98695.947528799@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have to agree with this poster. The next release should be > called FreeBSD 5.0. Guys, guys, can we end this discussion now? A new version numbering scheme was already chosen for 3.0 and we're sticking with it, up to and including release 4.4. None of this discussion has come even close to making me change my mind, so unless you guys have some more substantive arguments you've yet to trot out yet, I honestly have to recommend that you save your fingers the wear-and-tear. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message