From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 17 16:43:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C84FC05 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D289E2B73 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-111-1.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.111.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 140AF3CC54; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:43:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s7HGhVrI003116; Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:43:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:43:31 +0200 From: Polytropon To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Flash plugin ? Message-Id: <20140817184331.d71e1791.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <53F0D91A.6070608@hiwaay.net> References: <53F0986B.2000604@hiwaay.net> <20140817135824.78df3203.freebsd@edvax.de> <53F0A6DB.7000106@hiwaay.net> <20140817150601.fbb663e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <53F0D91A.6070608@hiwaay.net> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:43:34 -0000 On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 11:32:26 -0500, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I used to use/like Opera some years ago (on a 933 MHz P3, to date > things), but it had a period when it was quite unstable, basically > unusable, so I dumped it .... I would be perfectly willing to look at it > again, you recommend ? Definitely. At least the older versions. I have read about new Opera development, primarily an exchange of the rendering component (HTML engine) as well as usability reconsiderations. I'm not sure if I would like the new Opera. I'm still using the 11.50 version (with "Flash") which is stable, fast, and nice to use. Especially mouse gestures and the excellent (!) keyboard support is something that I find superior to Firefox or Chromium. But my view definitely is not objective, because I'm using Opera since version 5 happily and almost exclusively. So they have been washing my brain for years. :-) If you don't mind, just try Opera for reference, simply to check if "Flash" works for you in that constellation. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...