From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  8 21:53:20 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D13106564A
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2011 21:53:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1849D8FC16
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2011 21:53:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC328427;
	Thu,  8 Sep 2011 23:34:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ip-86-49-61-235.net.upcbroadband.cz
	[86.49.61.235])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ACEC28424;
	Thu,  8 Sep 2011 23:34:34 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E6934E9.306@quip.cz>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 23:34:33 +0200
From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
References: <slrnj4oiiq.21rg.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>	<dae4b29c363977d83e857bed8e253ae8@etoilebsd.net>	<j2u27m$euj$1@dough.gmane.org>	<slrnj5au9n.7nm.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>	<20110830082328.GB8085@lonesome.com>	<slrnj5qnk8.17m0.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net>	<20110831002621.GA24932@lonesome.com>	<E1QyYuy-0002bj-0u@hanssachs.home>
	<20110901072708.GL3376@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110901072708.GL3376@lonesome.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Alex Goncharov <alex-goncharov@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:53:20 -0000

Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:44:36PM -0400, Alex Goncharov wrote:
>> You may find this discussion useful:
>>
>>    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-users/2011/08/04/msg008743.html
>>
>> (referencing probably the most appropriate message in the thread.)
>
> I've gone ahead and put a cross-reference to this into the following
> wiki page:
>
>    http://wiki.freebsd.org/PackageSystemsFeatureComparison
>
> (It turns out that this information already existed in the wiki but
> buried in another page, so I created this new page.)
>
> That page needs to be updated.  I welcome any help to do so.

It is really nice starting point for comparision!

What you think about adding PC-BSD's PBI to the table? I think it is 
closely related to FreeBSD project and many potential FreeBSD users will 
come from PC-BSD camp (or vice versa).


You can update the FreeBSD column with this:

Config files updating tool            NO
Startup scripts management tool       NO
Automatic restart of daemons          NO

Automatic management of users/groups  YES
License framework (info/agreement)    YES

Thank you for your work.

Miroslav Lachman