From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 22 09:58:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F26A1065672 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cmail.optima.ua (cmail.optima.ua [195.248.191.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822888FC18 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@FreeBSD.org) X-Spam-Flag: SKIP X-Spam-Yversion: Spamooborona-2.1.0 Received: from [212.86.226.226] (account mav@alkar.net HELO mavbook.mavhome.dp.ua) by cmail.optima.ua (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.9) with ESMTPSA id 238130883; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:58:00 +0200 Message-ID: <49C60BA8.8080404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:58:00 +0200 From: Alexander Motin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090118) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ulf@Alameda.net References: <1237594983.00089764.1237583401@10.7.7.3> <49C4B848.1010906@mavhome.dp.ua> <200903211449.n2LEmxwC034905@lava.sentex.ca> <49C5292F.1050802@FreeBSD.org> <200903212149.n2LLnC94037010@lava.sentex.ca> <20090321222116.GG51533@evil.alameda.net> <200903212323.n2LNN3La037490@lava.sentex.ca> <20090322000633.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> In-Reply-To: <20090322000633.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Intel X58 eSATA port ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:58:02 -0000 Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > Soren was asking for controller cards which have this chip on board > before he stopped working on the ATA/SATA stuff. Specific because of > ESATA support I believe. So it might just not work with the current > driver. I think it is not an eSATA specific. IMHO it is more probable that either this card just reports itself as regular ATA while is also supports AHCI (and we can try to force AHCI driver attach it), but there still question about PATA channels, or like JMicron chips it provides combination of regular PATA and AHCI SATA via the same PCI device function. -- Alexander Motin