Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:32:38 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r392666 - head/audio/libgroove Message-ID: <9e0f61d80cec95a2ff54af98f1421878@gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <55AF9AAC.8000106@marino.st> References: <201507220652.t6M6qVFO094263@repo.freebsd.org> <d4dfd69de717fd8d4e5ef472408644e1@gahr.ch> <20150722122313.GA50653@FreeBSD.org> <20150722122531.GB50653@FreeBSD.org> <de0f94bb48432295c450da4dffbd4ba6@gahr.ch> <55AF9AAC.8000106@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2015-07-22 15:29, John Marino wrote: > On 7/22/2015 2:44 PM, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> On 2015-07-22 14:25, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> In clear contrast with the PHB, which states "If this line is present, >> future maintainers must >> not change or remove it except at the original author's request." >> >> It does *not* say "Future maintainers can change it if not explicitly >> asked not to.". >> >> Look, we do have rules so we don't have to argue about taste, style, >> what's more sensible to you, etc. >> >>> Sorry I forgot to ask: so any problem with expansion? >> >> Yes, I do. Please revert. >> > > So reverting it obviously goes against current practice. Is the > "problem" one of principle? In other words, are you torqued because > danfe touched the makefile, so you want him to revert it regardless of > the commit itself? From afar, this appears like you are trying to make > a point at the expense of the ports tree. I never meant to revert the whole commit, sorry for the wording. Does 'please get back the "Created by" line as it was before' sound ok? > > John -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9e0f61d80cec95a2ff54af98f1421878>