Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:51:03 +0400
From:      Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com>
To:        CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, delphij@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: misc/164290: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE
Message-ID:  <20120119025103.GA1176@sirius.xvoid.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFYkXj=s_bOqEjxitGLz-cXMsebWaNqtRS2B2=ST4EzKk4oc3w@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201201182118.q0ILIYaq079339@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAFYkXj=s_bOqEjxitGLz-cXMsebWaNqtRS2B2=ST4EzKk4oc3w@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 09:26:33PM +0000, CeDeROM wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:18 PM,  <delphij@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Synopsis: FreeBSD 9.0 IS NOT YET PRODUCTION/STABLE
> > I'm closing this PR because it does not contain any details about the
> > hardware nor have any proposal about how to deal with the problem.
> >
> > Please, become an active participant of the project by downloading and
> > testing the images when we are doing BETA and RCs, and shout out loudly
> > if you hit some bugs and these problems gets addressed.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=164290
> 
> Then simply call for testing, work more on making it stable

You have to be paying someone to tell them to "work more". Jump in and
help.

> and when 
> its stable mark it stable. The logical consequence of releasing
> unstable as production is to lie to users. New people that install 9.0

Again, blame yourself for not testing it.

> release/stable that even won't install will never look at this system
> again, the changes instroduced in 9.0 makes even me want to switch to
> another os :-(

It'd be sad to see you go, but that's how life goes...


Yuri



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120119025103.GA1176>