From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 9 17:06:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A121065674 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709DD8FC16 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so1092781ewy.13 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=G9jk/0uld22d1X2yENnKjh8zcRc43pVZ+0ltzvHuq2o=; b=DPttUwlLWcIR4zZWf4NIP3AZkx+z5WM8jKLkkn/GG88EqoP3StJ+L4JfGEPXjLVXFd REqobN2zNCCTvquo1ffuiCNx6eF7QTGJhe+Do5d17ljTP295HvOon0jU3xWn8QcatVzq 7UbgijbXG+OtILa/JAHEuLKg3fjr+52gC2bnk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=CaOAckkhJNWNUhTwgHCN/ULReojGyDI9JR4QXLm2EqBnAVcfk2sJlu/LQdt8dfQr0t 2IfSP+DAdo8uW9CUBaHi0gpnxNfjIlpSicsSBiic7fjZUf8/FHC6fk6DOvgiVqV3KzeK nWSAPmEQD6XetGJMhOWX3vyTmnO+OQhKJ9Mwg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.13.142 with SMTP id c14mr2356948eba.84.1286643969052; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.47.14 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 10:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:06:09 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: Like it or not, Theo is having a good laugh .. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:06:11 -0000 >"Surrilous" isn't an English word, nor an obvious typo of one, so I >have no idea what you mean here. He probably meant "scurrilous", which seems obvious to me. Look, can we move on now? Yes, export restrictions will apply, in the U.S. and -- what seems to have been overlooked in this thread -- _elsewhere_, regardless of the license text. The Canadians who were commenting unfavorably on U.S. laws may want to look over their own controls, http://www.international.gc.ca/controls-controles/assets/pdfs/documents/exportcontrols2007-en.pdf which leave them open to prosecution if they are exporting some software that might appear innocuous. The same can be said for many other countries. We're not going to resolve these problems in this thread. b.