From nobody Mon Jan 24 06:40:03 2022 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163E21985422 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 06:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) Received: from mx2.quinteiro.org (mx2.quinteiro.org [71.19.154.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jj0j31GsKz4m5C for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 06:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) Received: from www.quinteiro.org (www.quinteiro.org [204.109.56.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.quinteiro.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8C7421D9A6 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 06:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@quinteiro.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=quinteiro.org; s=default; t=1643006405; bh=dYYYJdrqzy985AHyFF1BJQxSUziLsyP9voarGMCkMGs=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ncEES6aTANYYFrdAalk0vFJEbIWap4pimElhMbwhcRmEtZcerYYjsz/iyhYQ6ROf6 QRGnyFrAVP54aQ42c2ObwlJVYbfcJUm7bNcr26LyETZQ3GUqy41zMKaPqWeoabn23M eLAs4JqpNpzvhSUsKSVt0X9NQEzojZy4y3W6Y/6k= Received: from [172.16.1.157] (unknown [198.27.183.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.quinteiro.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 673232E823 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2022 06:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <57ef0dec-bf31-9782-f675-8740816c05b6@quinteiro.org> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:40:03 -0800 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.1 Subject: Re: Deprecation of the ftp support in pkg Content-Language: en-US To: ports@freebsd.org References: <202201232112.20NLCfhS018923@nuc.oldach.net> From: Jose Quinteiro In-Reply-To: <202201232112.20NLCfhS018923@nuc.oldach.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Jj0j31GsKz4m5C X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=quinteiro.org header.s=default header.b=ncEES6aT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@quinteiro.org designates 71.19.154.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@quinteiro.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.41 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[quinteiro.org:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[quinteiro.org]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[quinteiro.org:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.906]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:47066, ipnet:71.19.154.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 1/23/22 13:12, Helge Oldach wrote: > Stefan Esser wrote on Sun, 23 Jan 2022 21:08:30 +0100 (CET): >> Am 23.01.22 um 18:12 schrieb Jose Quinteiro: >>> On 1/23/22 09:06, tech-lists wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 08:55:09AM -0800, Jose Quinteiro wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can run HTTP on a non-standard port. For example, 8080 is commonly >>>>> used. As an added bonus, this means that the HTTP server need not run as >>>>> root. >>>> >>>> Unless I'm mistaken, there is no web server in base. There is though, an >>>> ftp server. >>> >>> Touche. I wouldn't mind having Thttpd in base. >>> https://www.acme.com/software/thttpd/ >> >> An interesting idea, we have it as a port in www/thttpd. > > Does thttpd support SSL in the meantime? I suspect that is an option people would ask for instantly. > It does not. This is by design. It is really meant to be as small and simple as possible. Not unlike the Varnish no-ssl design decision. Thanks, Jose