From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 23:19:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D392016A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:19:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from philemon.caltech.edu (philemon.caltech.edu [131.215.158.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F1343D3F for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:19:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@philemon.caltech.edu) Received: from philemon.caltech.edu (localhost.caltech.edu [127.0.0.1]) by philemon.caltech.edu (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j03NIlKX023434 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:18:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jd@philemon.caltech.edu) Received: (from jd@localhost) by philemon.caltech.edu (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id j03NIlJ4023433 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:18:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:18:47 -0800 From: Paul Allen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050103231847.GJ22456@philemon.caltech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 5-STABLE or -CURRENT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 23:19:25 -0000 I had experienced some issues with 5.3-Release vis-a-vis bad bounce buffer panics. Am I correct in my read of the mailing list that 5.3-Stable Resolves these issues? Additionally, I was wondering if it was regarded as better to run some snapshot of current. I've heard some off hand remarks along the lines of "everyone who is running on amd64 should be running -CURRENT." Is this true? -Paul