Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 23:52:46 +0200 From: cpghost@cordula.ws To: koen de wijs <koendewijs@gmx.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <20050420215246.GA76908@epia2.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <426686A2.4030303@gmx.net> References: <426686A2.4030303@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 06:43:14PM +0200, koen de wijs wrote: > I'm new to unix. This year I tried FreeBSD. Some friend of mine adviced > FreeBSD. I think it works great. Only one thing that I don't like is > that you will need to know a lot to setup a lot of basic stuff. > I want to try out Linux. I heard it is more user friendly and the basic > stuff will be set up during installation. Hi Koen, comparing Linux to FreeBSD is a touchy topic here, not because of the comparison per se (both are very good), but because it's regularly being abused by trolls as the most likely flamebait. Anyway: both systems are Unix-like, and almost all programs that you know from Linux run natively under FreeBSD as well. It's just a matter of installing the appropriate port or meta-port. The internals however are different: it's a totally different kernel, a different userland, ... but also a different approach regarding code contributions and project management. But that doesn't matter (much) to the end user. There are some comparisons between Linux and FreeBSD out there regarding performance, but if you look at it from a bird's view, both are roughly comparable and doing just well. Unless you run a big, very high load server, you won't notice much difference at all. Ease of administration is also an important topic, esp. if you have to manage your own (set of) machine(s). Here, you can't compare FreeBSD to Linux, at best FreeBSD to specific Linux distros (which all vary widely w.r.t. admin philosophy). FreeBSD is extremely easy to configure and manage. Not necessarily with flashy GUI yast-like frontends, but by setting config variables in plain old text files like /etc/rc.conf and putting scripts in /etc/rc.d, /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Keeping up to date is also extremely convenient with cvsup/make buildworld... [gentoo borrowed its philosophy from the BSD ports and source code driven updating]. > I really don't like the sysinstall menu. It is really unlogically. Why > isn't there a desktop and a server installation? What do you thing is illogical in the current sysinstall? sysinstall is not the kind of program that you would spend a lot of time using. Once the system is installed, you don't need it anymore and can simply edit things in /etc/rc.conf yourself. Of course, nothing prevents you from writing a GUIfied install program once you're not a newbie anymore. But you'll probably then decide that it is not really such a big deal or worth the effort. ;-) > Could anyone give me a good site that describes the differences between > FreeBSD and Linux? See previous postings. Just give them all a try, and stick to the OS you like the best. You can always re-evaluate later when you've acquired more Unix knowledge. > Koen > (I don't want to start a flame war, only some good sites) Cheers, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050420215246.GA76908>