Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:56:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Patrick Tracanelli <eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xsan (Apple) on FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0708021152440.25296@muncher> In-Reply-To: <46B1EDCC.2080803@freebsdbrasil.com.br> References: <46B0F505.8090102@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <a969fbd10708011502n5dd8034m7cc0abef3a62c5e6@mail.gmail.com> <46B10798.5050504@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <200708011536.37926.matt@ixsystems.com> <46B12D0C.20808@freebsd.org> <46B1D167.4030206@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0708021011570.10381@muncher> <46B1EDCC.2080803@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > > But delegation feature would not fit in an enviroment where we have two > systems accessing the server (same shares, or even the whole nfs4 root), so > parallel nfs4 usage cant count on this feature :/ > I'm not sure what you are saying. Delegations are "per file". If you are read/write sharing the same file across multiple clients then, yes, delegations won't help your case. Btw, if your disks are 100% busy, there isn't much you can do except spread the load across more drives on the NFS server, to get better NFS perf, imo. rick.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.0708021152440.25296>