From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Feb 2 8:54:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70D8401D for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA36797; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:53:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:53:24 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Egervary Gergely Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NMBCLUSTERS Message-ID: <20000202105324.E31919@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20000202100739.B31919@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from "Egervary Gergely" on Wed Feb 2 17:45:13 GMT 2000 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Feb 02), Egervary Gergely said: > hmm right. well I've just compiled with 4096, my statistics after 9 > minutes uptime: > > 2308/3182/4096 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) I'd say you need to raise it a bit more then if you're at 75% capacity after only 9 minutes :) Although if you are already at your peak load for the day, you might be okay. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message