From owner-freebsd-standards Thu Feb 27 9:37: 3 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEEF37B418 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:37:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from espresso.bsdmike.org (espresso.bsdmike.org [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CE043F93 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:37:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@espresso.bsdmike.org) Received: by espresso.bsdmike.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id AA5289C5F; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:24:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:24:21 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: Tony Finch Cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: default gcc conformance mode Message-ID: <20030227122421.C93968@espresso.bsdmike.org> References: <20030227170049.A1958@chiark.greenend.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030227170049.A1958@chiark.greenend.org.uk>; from dot@dotat.at on Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 05:00:49PM +0000 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tony Finch writes: > Should the default conformance mode of gcc be C99+extensions rather > than C89+extensions? This would make the -pedantic option more useful. I think some would argue against it, since we don't have a complete C99 library yet. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message