From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 18:34:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D816A4CE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:34:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp003.bizmail.yahoo.com (smtp003.bizmail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F24A943D55 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:34:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noackjr@supercrime.org@70.240.217.225 with login) by smtp003.bizmail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2004 18:34:14 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED5761AA; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:34:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05080-01; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:34:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from www.noacks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0A6610C; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:34:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 69.53.57.66 (SquirrelMail authenticated user noackjr); by www.noacks.org with HTTP; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:34:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <62946.69.53.57.66.1093890851.squirrel@69.53.57.66> In-Reply-To: <4133683A.3090201@portaone.com> References: <4133683A.3090201@portaone.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 13:34:11 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jon Noack" To: "Maxim Sobolev" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at noacks.org cc: "current@freebsd.org" cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd(8) usability: why `-s max' isn't default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:34:15 -0000 Maxim Sobolev wrote: > I wonder if there are any compelling reasons why `-s max' is not default > behaviour of burncd(8). IMHO, there is no point to have default of 4. > Usually, today's drives are smart enough to select the maximum speed > supported both by drive and by the medium. In the past we did not have ATAPI DMA default to on. You're just asking for trouble trying to write at high speed with PIO, regardless of Burn Proof. Now that we do have ATAPI DMA on, we could (relatively) safely change burncd to default at max speed. However, there may be issues I am not aware of that would prevent this change. Jon