From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 08:48:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD17B16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7820343D58 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 08:47:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1A3651FC; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:45:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 92369-04; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:45:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A0E651F7; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:45:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 786C840; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:45:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:45:51 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Bob Van Valzah Message-ID: <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Van Valzah , FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org References: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> cc: FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 16:48:29 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. > I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any > user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support > would be present with no routing daemon. Am I missing something > obvious? We don't have pimsd or pimdd for IPv4 in ports at the moment. Patches will be gratefully accepted! BMS