From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Oct 27 06:27:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-doc Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA18409 for doc-outgoing; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 06:27:34 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id GAA18404 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 06:27:31 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA25411 (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for doc@freebsd.org); Fri, 27 Oct 1995 08:04:47 -0500 Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id HAA20157; Fri, 27 Oct 1995 07:49:52 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 07:49:52 -0500 From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Message-Id: <199510271249.HAA20157@bonkers.taronga.com> To: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Manual in printed form Newsgroups: taronga.freebsd.doc In-Reply-To: <199510261619.JAA11844@freefall.freebsd.org> Organization: Taronga Park BBS Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In article <199510261619.JAA11844@freefall.freebsd.org>, Gary Clark II wrote: >John, I would prefer to stick with LaTeX for printing vice groff! >The reason why I say this is groff just can not produce nice output. I would disagree. I much prefer reading troff output than tex, though that could simply be a factor of the way the default macro packages behave. TeX documents tend to oversized text, inconsistent headers and footers, and while Computer Modern is a pleasant enough typeface it doesn't benefit at all from our 600 dpi laser printers. You can quite likely get better results from TeX if you work at it, but it's much easier to get acceptable output from troff.