From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 16 05:10:47 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7810625E
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:10:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13::5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E74E5A
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:10:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6G5AfH6023867;
 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:10:42 +0700 (NOVT)
 (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net)
Message-ID: <51E4D5CC.9030601@grosbein.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:10:36 +0700
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130415 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
References: <1373900675.35372.YahooMailBasic@web121605.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1373900675.35372.YahooMailBasic@web121605.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:10:47 -0000

On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba wrote:

> Also, IP fragmentation and TCP segments are not the same thing. TCP
> segments regularly will come in out of order, NFS is too stupid to do
> things correctly; IP fragmentation should not be done unless necessary
> to accommodate a smaller mtu.

The PR is about NFS over UDP, not TCP.