From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 6 19:15:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F1916A400 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from llevier@argosnet.com) Received: from mx.levier.org (ns.argosnet.com [213.251.139.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB4A13C44C for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from llevier@argosnet.com) Received: from localhost (ns [213.251.139.26]) by mx.levier.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457E8267E1F; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:15:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at argosnet.com Received: from mx.levier.org ([213.251.139.26]) by localhost (ns.levier.org [213.251.139.26]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxTxvp-6f7xx; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:15:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Osgiliath.argosnet.com (tirion.argosnet.com [82.224.1.141]) by mx.levier.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6118A267E18; Fri, 6 Jul 2007 21:15:19 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:15:16 +0200 To: David DeSimone ,"Scott Ullrich" From: Laurent LEVIER In-Reply-To: <20070706003051.GC3557@verio.net> References: <20070705062546.BF688267E13@mx.levier.org> <6e6841490707050611l66b7b705h2889dcaf8a2fc784@mail.gmail.com> <20070705164343.3F2E7267F61@mx.levier.org> <20070706003051.GC3557@verio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-Id: <20070706191519.6118A267E18@mx.levier.org> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issue with PF on FreeBSD 6.2.5? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:15:57 -0000 Hi All, At 02:30 06/07/2007, David DeSimone wrote: >Do you mean that you checked the session table (pfctl -ss) before and >after running the pfctl -k command, and you find that the session is not >removed? First, thanks for your help. I finally found the issue... I was pinging indefinitely a host to check barring. Apparently, UDP & TCP are really blocked right after the pfctl -k, but ICMP ping (a ping -t from Windoze) keeps working. Whatever I attempted to do, I did not succeeded setting up a real barring on all ports & protocols. I must now check some other weird protocols as AH/ESP to ensure the HotSpot really bars properly traffic. Brgrds Laurent LEVIER Systems & Networks Senior Security Expert, CISSP CISM