Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:12:28 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CFT: k8temp driver Message-ID: <86fxvzrvlf.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <375A934D-77AA-4601-8E21-47AE4C3603EE@FreeBSD.org> (Rui Paulo's message of "Mon\, 11 Feb 2008 20\:38\:11 %2B0000") References: <A611E395-3531-4026-B8B3-5EFA72BA48E1@FreeBSD.org> <86abm82wvx.fsf@ds4.des.no> <375A934D-77AA-4601-8E21-47AE4C3603EE@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > Is there any way you can have it report the higher of these two as > > dev.cpu.N.temperature, for compatibility with coretemp(4)? This will > > make life much easier for system monitoring software (munin, nagios > > etc) > Yes, I could try that, but what namespace (compatible with > dev.cpu.N.temperature) do you suggest? > dev.cpu.N.temperature > dev.cpu.N.temperature2 ? As I wrote (see quoted text above), just have dev.cpu.N.temperature report the highest of the two. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fxvzrvlf.fsf>