From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 21 20:02:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2732F1065695; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:02:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rpaulo@freebsd.org) Received: from karen.lavabit.com (karen.lavabit.com [72.249.41.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979AF8FC13; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:02:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d.earth.lavabit.com (d.earth.lavabit.com [192.168.111.13]) by karen.lavabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030DB11B8B4; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:02:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 10.0.10.3 (54.81.54.77.rev.vodafone.pt [77.54.81.54]) by lavabit.com with ESMTP id C6BMZWVQVM25; Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:02:37 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:02:34 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201008191131.o7JBV4Yf002412@svn.freebsd.org> <4C6D18BE.2000905@fer.hr> <4C6D95A8.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <20100819213159.B48418@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C6DDB74.3090102@FreeBSD.org> <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org> <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Ana Kukec , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 20:02:39 -0000 On 21 Aug 2010, at 19:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/21/2010 05:07, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> Meanwhile, the fact that in the past code has been committed >>> without man pages is the exact cause of the problem you're >>> describing. It is certainly not a justification for continuing to >>> do it wrong. >>=20 >> Reverting code just because it doesn't have a man page is pointless. >> Everyone can write the damn man page, but not everyone can write >> code. You should really take this into consideration when proposing a >> commit to be reverted. >=20 > So let's assume that having lots of code in the tree without a man = page is a problem. Further, let's assume that we don't want the problem = to get worse. How do you propose that we accomplish that? By writing man pages...? Like I said, everyone can write a man page.. I did write man pages for = stuff that hasn't had a man page for years (ctfmerge, ctfconvert, etc.). Regards, -- Rui Paulo