From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 10:56:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93851065673 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from sorbesgroup.com (mail.sorbesgroup.com [217.159.241.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4BF8FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antik@bsd.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E253C5298A for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:23:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from sorbesgroup.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sorbesgroup.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28743-06 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:23:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (andrei [192.168.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sorbesgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E5C3C52980 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:23:00 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <491D5296.3000600@bsd.ee> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:27:34 +0200 From: Andrei Kolu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost Subject: Filesystem size and free space X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:56:43 -0000 Hi, due to migration from Windows Server 2003 NTFS filesystem to FreeBSD 7.1Beta2 UFS+softupdates filesystem I encountered strange problem. NTFS formatted filesystem seen in FreeBSD as read-only and exactly 500GB with 28GB free space but after format to UFS disk shows up as 484GB and after copying back files that was on same disk (from ntfs) UFS filesystem shows that I got -33GB (minus?) of free space. What's wrong? Is UFS so inefficient filesystem or it is a bug? Andrei