From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 25 03:25:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E7116A41B for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PT=09b3190e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC6713C4B2 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+PT=09b3190e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9B1D059E for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:25:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:25:14 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071025042514.58181a50@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <471FF7E2.3010004@gmail.com> References: <471FAFD4.5090500@gmail.com> <20071025022632.72fd6283@gumby.homeunix.com.> <471FF7E2.3010004@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: forcing compilation/run time linking of lib32 on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 03:25:18 -0000 On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:56:50 -0400 "Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:49:24 -0400 > > "Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote: > > > > > >> I am writing some demo code (for teaching C) ... showing that > >> int's are always word length > >> > > > > s/always/typically/ > > > > C has been around for a long time and there is always a > > counter-example to any sweeping generalisation that isn't backed-up > > by a standards document. > > BTW I was slightly wrong it is longs not int's that change depending > on word size: What's variable is defined by the standard, not by the differences between particular implementations.