Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Oct 2007 04:25:14 +0100
From:      RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: forcing compilation/run time linking of lib32 on amd64
Message-ID:  <20071025042514.58181a50@gumby.homeunix.com.>
In-Reply-To: <471FF7E2.3010004@gmail.com>
References:  <471FAFD4.5090500@gmail.com> <20071025022632.72fd6283@gumby.homeunix.com.> <471FF7E2.3010004@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:56:50 -0400
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote:

> RW wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:49:24 -0400
> > "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> I am writing some demo code (for teaching C) ... showing that
> >> int's are always word length
> >>     
> >
> > s/always/typically/
> >
> > C has been around for a long time and there is always a
> > counter-example to any sweeping generalisation that isn't backed-up
> > by a standards document. 
> 
> BTW I was slightly wrong it is longs not int's that change depending
> on word size:

What's variable is defined by the standard, not by the  differences
between particular implementations. 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071025042514.58181a50>