From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon May  6 23:26:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA15065
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 6 May 1996 23:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA15060
          Mon, 6 May 1996 23:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA07504; Mon, 6 May 1996 23:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org>
cc: chuckr@Glue.umd.edu, FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Tcl75/tk41 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 May 1996 20:01:01 PDT."
             <199605070301.UAA03812@freefall.freebsd.org> 
Date: Mon, 06 May 1996 23:26:35 -0700
Message-ID: <7502.831450395@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>   > Am I the only one who has really checked out applications under the newly
 
>   > released versions of tcl/tk, 7.5 and 4.1?
> 
> I am running all my tcl applications with tcl 7.5 and tk 4.1, including
> exmh and expect, the really hard one.

As I told Chuck, others like `nv' will still fail miserably.