From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 10 02:11:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7F9B99 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D089B25F5 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9A2BUeZ012503 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:30 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from bdrewery@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9A2BUS3012502 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:30 GMT (envelope-from bdrewery) Received: (qmail 945 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2013 21:11:28 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.0.24?) (freebsd@shatow.net@10.10.0.24) by sweb.xzibition.com with ESMTPA; 9 Oct 2013 21:11:28 -0500 Message-ID: <52560CCB.6070407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:11:23 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: Messages while (re)installing portupgrade References: <81783.1381361719@server1.tristatelogic.com> In-Reply-To: <81783.1381361719@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 OpenPGP: id=3C9B0CF9; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OW9if8QEfPXG8Lnhxsh73NxcttIbbrw5o" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OW9if8QEfPXG8Lnhxsh73NxcttIbbrw5o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/9/2013 6:35 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >=20 >=20 > Because I just switched from ruby1.8 to ruby1.9 I've had to > rebuild and reinstall my ports-mgmt/portupgrade port. That all > went well, but I got some messages at the end of the re-install > process that I've never noticed before, and they are all rather > befuddling to me: >=20 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- > Fill ALT_PKGDEP section in pkgtools.conf file for portupgrade to = be > aware of alternative dependencies you use. > E.g. > ALT_PKGDEP =3D { > # Use the -nox11 port when another port depends on category/por= texample > 'category/portexample' =3D> 'category/portexample-nox11', > } >=20 > Note also, portupgrade knows nothing about how to handle ports wi= th > different suffixes (E.g. -nox11). So you should explicitly define= > variables (E.g. WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes) for the ports in /etc/make.con= f or > pkgtools.conf (MAKE_ARGS section) files. > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- >=20 > I have no idea what any of the above means. Should I be at all concern= ed? This has been here for many years. You can safely ignore this. It is just a way to override port dependencies if you want without needing to modify the port files. >=20 > Where exactly is this alleged "pkgtools.conf" file. I looked in /etc. > It ain't there. I've never even heard of it until today. portupgrade supports a config file in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf >=20 > I grok the general idea that there may be a file someplace (called > "pkgtools.conf") wherein one may explicitly override various otherwise > hardwired inter-port dependencies, but what has that got to do with > me? >=20 > I _do_ use X, so none of the rest of this stuff seems the least bit > relevant to anything I am doing. Am I perhaps mistaken? --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --OW9if8QEfPXG8Lnhxsh73NxcttIbbrw5o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSVgzLAAoJEG54KsA8mwz5/YgQAIgUWCnLzan/qpQ4eDJWY59y J3+aonAvYCSgZOYtnM455McQaW7Gkquy2b+eDSzea+udEoykn9R+4LKEoEpdfROF O0U8gc6F8UteD/bTkxliFApyU6fJWWK8AgMkKphgao+hD+WkKOCzjvmlpSGuk+em EzYPt8FEoEEqrxKkKGkhou8Xj7dXi/fcUfQdwMmzHiBuF/iB6R85ZQAmwi3bJncS igV6EKT7nyXBcqqA/KqZRBTX9A9vvaRFJSuiHlDOXnmLez0nbtn65ci04jf1wLd4 YzIiLC9I5n1nr0nDQMV50kr8L5t4p4/eISAd+Z/2Nz/vXEmy3si41XpZHnAcH6zO 4m0ChmjQx74DjWVXL04bxV1Ps6M9Mb47hZxei245ujAQfF6DJZKMi37D/t7wY960 wi/HNbPlzepa/i2LPdsL0Zz3BlESfrhRuKBtn10rjYUYdVK72n906b53Lc8ryhXI mwmNSk0ho7CxK75epBNahnB+97dVP1jQr450plFZEGNlVhBOhMO3GPPskxY0LYy0 Y0kFRzHasQIwVTGClIWD705gPCXRwL3g0J+vRoSJS7JYuVf1g8wvxgR238ulESwh sVSDdObFlnhXS8DWj39vKYXuOSo6FwW80gjsGoVSFdYDF7A4sI91Je5ulVGGeV55 P1D5JDQjj9di0anU6Br3 =N4lD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OW9if8QEfPXG8Lnhxsh73NxcttIbbrw5o--