Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:56:55 -0400 From: Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Adrian Filipi-Martin <adrian@ubergeeks.com>, FreeBSD Hackers List <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: tuning a CPU bound server Message-ID: <20020520175655.C58376@mail.k12us.com> In-Reply-To: <3CE953E9.17007B81@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:52:09PM -0700 References: <20020520111759.I35309-100000@lorax.ubergeeks.com> <3CE953E9.17007B81@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:52:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > The problem is that as you maintain your patches, and the patch > vendor maintains their patches, and DJB maintains his code, you > end up with network effects. > But DJB does't maintain his code. I don't think it he has touched it in years. Otherwise you are of course correct :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020520175655.C58376>