From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Nov 17 03:25:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA03771 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 03:25:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from meowy.angio.net (meowy.angio.net [206.197.119.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA03766 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 03:25:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from angio@meowy.angio.net) Received: from meowy.angio.net (localhost.angio.net [127.0.0.1]) by meowy.angio.net (8.8.8/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA22561 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 1997 04:25:09 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199711171125.EAA22561@meowy.angio.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Twice as many OS/2 as FreeBSD ??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Nov 1997 15:42:25 EST." <19971116154225.31523@vmunix.com> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 04:25:09 -0700 From: Dave Andersen Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Personally, I renice the process to +20 - is there really much difference > between +19 and +20? Just curious... :-) > > At any rate, with the process running at nice +20 I can see no > notiecable slow down on my system. Pretty neat. Unix. It works. Go > figure. :-) If you're really concerned about it, then idprio them: idprio 31 rc564 This will cause the process to _only_ execute when there is nothing else that can run; nice +20 will still grab a little tiny bit of CPU time every now and then. Functionally, it doesn't make much of a difference, but for the paranoid, the option is there, and it can't hurt if you're running the rc5 client on a machine that's used for other things. -Dave