Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 09:36:46 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports Message-ID: <20040524143646.GO98339@sirius.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]> <xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eHmdSDY+kY2au76U Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > You can't possibly seriously believe that the project will adopt this > model without first seeing proof that it works and has significant > advantages (and no significant disadvantages) over the existing model. >=20 > This (reengineering the ports tree) has been tried before, BTW. It > didn't fly, and the project (openpackages.org) is now dead. That project had little to do with FreeBSD, and certainly wasn't a "reengineering" of our ports tree. Regards, --=20 wca --eHmdSDY+kY2au76U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAsgh+F47idPgWcsURAs/jAJ9JtWLiisWIs8AZTvVCHA0fjMK6yQCggaGm LvHYRGcN7/2TA/9vBqorAEo= =xKUN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eHmdSDY+kY2au76U--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524143646.GO98339>