Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 May 2004 09:36:46 -0500
From:      Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports
Message-ID:  <20040524143646.GO98339@sirius.firepipe.net>
In-Reply-To: <xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]> <xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf@dwp.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--eHmdSDY+kY2au76U
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:12:52PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> You can't possibly seriously believe that the project will adopt this
> model without first seeing proof that it works and has significant
> advantages (and no significant disadvantages) over the existing model.
>=20
> This (reengineering the ports tree) has been tried before, BTW.  It
> didn't fly, and the project (openpackages.org) is now dead.

That project had little to do with FreeBSD, and certainly wasn't
a "reengineering" of our ports tree.

Regards,
--=20
wca

--eHmdSDY+kY2au76U
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAsgh+F47idPgWcsURAs/jAJ9JtWLiisWIs8AZTvVCHA0fjMK6yQCggaGm
LvHYRGcN7/2TA/9vBqorAEo=
=xKUN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--eHmdSDY+kY2au76U--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524143646.GO98339>